<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd"
	xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Was An ACMA Blacklist Leaked?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://techwiredau.com/2009/03/was-an-acma-blacklist-leaked/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://techwiredau.com/2009/03/was-an-acma-blacklist-leaked/</link>
	<description>Australian Technology News</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 04 Sep 2011 07:10:03 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: techydude</title>
		<link>http://techwiredau.com/2009/03/was-an-acma-blacklist-leaked/comment-page-1/#comment-7480</link>
		<dc:creator>techydude</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 31 Mar 2009 00:34:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://techwiredau.com/?p=3421#comment-7480</guid>
		<description>even now there&#039;s still alot of smoke being blown.  that ABC QnA episode last week was largely a waste of time, of the few sensible well-expressed questions asked, few answers really addressed key issues.  

&amp; if this topic attracted so much interested, why was only half the show dedicated to it, unlike so many other QnA episodes?!?

btw Ben, i&#039;ve been listening to TechWired for several months now, and am amazed at the quality of &#039;output&#039; from your good 18yo self.  well done mate, definitely one to keep reading/listning!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>even now there&#8217;s still alot of smoke being blown.  that ABC QnA episode last week was largely a waste of time, of the few sensible well-expressed questions asked, few answers really addressed key issues.  </p>
<p>&amp; if this topic attracted so much interested, why was only half the show dedicated to it, unlike so many other QnA episodes?!?</p>
<p>btw Ben, i&#8217;ve been listening to TechWired for several months now, and am amazed at the quality of &#8216;output&#8217; from your good 18yo self.  well done mate, definitely one to keep reading/listning!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chimbles</title>
		<link>http://techwiredau.com/2009/03/was-an-acma-blacklist-leaked/comment-page-1/#comment-7414</link>
		<dc:creator>Chimbles</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Mar 2009 04:44:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://techwiredau.com/?p=3421#comment-7414</guid>
		<description>I wonder if there is a list compiled by USA government… are we being kept in the dark? Because that would be quite funny since people are complaining about China censoring their internet.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I wonder if there is a list compiled by USA government… are we being kept in the dark? Because that would be quite funny since people are complaining about China censoring their internet.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Update#28: Politics, politics, politics, and TiVo — Midnight Update</title>
		<link>http://techwiredau.com/2009/03/was-an-acma-blacklist-leaked/comment-page-1/#comment-7348</link>
		<dc:creator>Update#28: Politics, politics, politics, and TiVo — Midnight Update</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 Mar 2009 13:56:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://techwiredau.com/?p=3421#comment-7348</guid>
		<description>[...] Shows    Whose blacklist is it anyway? Try asking Senator Conroy on ABC&#039;s Q&amp;A this Thursday; Is media monitoring a scary thing [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Shows    Whose blacklist is it anyway? Try asking Senator Conroy on ABC&#39;s Q&amp;A this Thursday; Is media monitoring a scary thing [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Stilgherrian</title>
		<link>http://techwiredau.com/2009/03/was-an-acma-blacklist-leaked/comment-page-1/#comment-7340</link>
		<dc:creator>Stilgherrian</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 Mar 2009 01:03:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://techwiredau.com/?p=3421#comment-7340</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m without my glasses because the afternoon sidelight streaming in through the windows was causing reflections and the cameraman couldn&#039;t find an angle where they weren&#039;t distracting.

I should mention that you can&#039;t tell by looking at a URL whether it should or shouldn&#039;t be on the list, only by looking at the content it references. A URL can be anything.

ACMA pushes out a blacklist update to the filter-makers (almost) every week. When asked in Senate Estimates about clearing out old entries they were a bit vague, but I was left with the distinct impression that it happens only infrequently.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m without my glasses because the afternoon sidelight streaming in through the windows was causing reflections and the cameraman couldn&#8217;t find an angle where they weren&#8217;t distracting.</p>
<p>I should mention that you can&#8217;t tell by looking at a URL whether it should or shouldn&#8217;t be on the list, only by looking at the content it references. A URL can be anything.</p>
<p>ACMA pushes out a blacklist update to the filter-makers (almost) every week. When asked in Senate Estimates about clearing out old entries they were a bit vague, but I was left with the distinct impression that it happens only infrequently.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sean the Blogonaut</title>
		<link>http://techwiredau.com/2009/03/was-an-acma-blacklist-leaked/comment-page-1/#comment-7303</link>
		<dc:creator>Sean the Blogonaut</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Mar 2009 23:58:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://techwiredau.com/?p=3421#comment-7303</guid>
		<description>Hey it&#039;s Stil without his glasses.

It is an interesting situation though.  It is a list with Australian content.  It has sites listed on it that should not be there ie dentists and website design company.  Do these lists get revised? Is there a system in place a method/process of requesting acma to review a list if you suspect your site might be on it? 

Now as for blocking stuff that we don&#039;t yet know about ...positively Orwellian</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hey it&#8217;s Stil without his glasses.</p>
<p>It is an interesting situation though.  It is a list with Australian content.  It has sites listed on it that should not be there ie dentists and website design company.  Do these lists get revised? Is there a system in place a method/process of requesting acma to review a list if you suspect your site might be on it? </p>
<p>Now as for blocking stuff that we don&#8217;t yet know about &#8230;positively Orwellian</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

